Prodr. Fl. Nov. Holland.: 491 (1810)
Each value Trefle shows for Cuscuta australis, with what every source says about it. When sources disagree, the strongest source is shown (how sources are ranked). Values imported before sources were recorded one by one are marked Source not recorded.
Something wrong? Suggest a correction.
| Field | Shown | What the sources say | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core | |||
| Author | R.Br. |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Bibliography | Prodr. Fl. Nov. Holland.: 491 (1810) |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Rank | species |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Status | accepted |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Year | 1810 |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Descriptive | |||
| Common name | Australian dodder |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Observations | Old World |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Morphology | |||
| Average height | empty |
|
Not on the record |
| Biological type | therophyte |
|
Sourced |
| Flower color | white |
|
Sourced |
| Foliage texture | empty |
|
Not on the record |
| Fruit shape | capsule |
|
Sourced |
| Sexuality | hermaphrodite |
|
Sourced |
| Phenology | |||
| Duration | annual |
|
Sourced |
| Ecology | |||
| Nitrogen fixation | None |
|
Sourced |
| Soil salinity | empty |
|
Not on the record |
| Other | |||
| Halophyte status | — |
|
Not on the record |
| Temperature indicator | — |
|
Not on the record |