Not an accepted name (status: unknown). No accepted name is recorded for it yet.

Nama dichotomum Choisy, 1913 4% complete

No common name

Mém. Soc. Phys. Genève, 6: 113, 113, 1833

Data sources

Each value Trefle shows for Nama dichotomum, with what every source says about it. When sources disagree, the strongest source is shown (how sources are ranked). Values imported before sources were recorded one by one are marked Source not recorded.

Something wrong? Suggest a correction.

Sourced1 Source not recorded6 Sources: Earlier Trefle data
Field Shown What the sources say
Core
Author Choisy No source recorded
Source not recorded
Bibliography Mém. Soc. Phys. Genève, 6: 113, 113, 1833 No source recorded
Source not recorded
Rank species No source recorded
Source not recorded
Status unknown No source recorded
Source not recorded
Year 1913 No source recorded
Source not recorded
Morphology
Growth habit Forb/herb
  • Forb/herb · Earlier Trefle data · Reported · 2026-10-19
    value present before provenance tracking (2022 import), no source recorded
Sourced
Vegetable false No source recorded
Source not recorded