Fl. Cochinch.: 29 (1790)
Each value Trefle shows for Osmanthus fragrans, with what every source says about it. When sources disagree, the strongest source is shown (how sources are ranked). Values imported before sources were recorded one by one are marked Source not recorded.
Something wrong? Suggest a correction.
| Field | Shown | What the sources say | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core | |||
| Author | Lour. |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Bibliography | Fl. Cochinch.: 29 (1790) |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Phylum | Tracheophyta |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Rank | species |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Status | accepted |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Year | 1790 |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Descriptive | |||
| Common name | Sweet osmanthus |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Family common name | Olive family |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Observations | Himalaya to S. Japan |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Morphology | |||
| Average height | 570 cm |
|
Sourced |
| Biological type | phanerophyte |
|
Sourced |
| Foliage color | green |
|
Sourced |
| Foliage texture | coarse |
|
Sourced |
| Vegetable | false |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Phenology | |||
| Duration | perennial |
|
Sourced |
| Usda legacy | |||
| C n ratio | empty |
|
Not on the record |
| Other | |||
| Human usage type | — |
|
Not on the record |