Data sources

Each value Trefle shows for Rhus virens, with what every source says about it. When sources disagree, the strongest source is shown (how sources are ranked). Values imported before sources were recorded one by one are marked Source not recorded.

Something wrong? Suggest a correction.

Sourced1 Source not recorded9 Not on the record2 Sources: TRY Plant Trait Database, Earlier Trefle data

Field	Shown	What the sources say
Core
Author	Lindh. ex A.Gray	No source recorded	Source not recorded
Bibliography	Boston J. Nat. Hist. 6: 159 (1850)	No source recorded	Source not recorded
Phylum	Tracheophyta	No source recorded	Source not recorded
Rank	species	No source recorded	Source not recorded
Status	accepted	No source recorded	Source not recorded
Year	1850	No source recorded	Source not recorded
Descriptive
Common name	Evergreen sumac	No source recorded	Source not recorded
Observations	SC. U.S.A. to Mexico	No source recorded	Source not recorded
Morphology
Growth habit	Tree, Shrub	Tree, Shrub · Earlier Trefle data · Reported · 2026-10-19 value present before provenance tracking (2022 import), no source recorded	Sourced
Sexuality	empty	dioecious · TRY Plant Trait Database · Measured · 1 observation · 2026-10-09 TRY 7.0 datasets 365	Not on the record
Vegetable	false	No source recorded	Source not recorded
Ecology
Nitrogen fixation	empty	None · TRY Plant Trait Database · Measured · 1 observation · 2026-10-09 TRY 7.0 datasets 822	Not on the record

Rhus virens Lindh. ex A.Gray, 1850 10% complete

Evergreen sumac

.fa-secondary{opacity:.4} Data sources

Data sources