Bot. Not. 1899: 41 (1899)
Each value Trefle shows for Rumex acetosella subsp. angiocarpus, with what every source says about it. When sources disagree, the strongest source is shown (how sources are ranked). Values imported before sources were recorded one by one are marked Source not recorded.
Something wrong? Suggest a correction.
| Field | Shown | What the sources say | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core | |||
| Author | (Murb.) Murb. |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Bibliography | Bot. Not. 1899: 41 (1899) |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Rank | ssp |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Status | accepted |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Year | 1899 |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Descriptive | |||
| Observations | WC. & C. Medit., S. Africa, Russian Far East |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Morphology | |||
| Average height | empty |
|
Not on the record |
| Growth habit | Forb/herb |
|
Sourced |
| Vegetable | false |
|
Sourced |
| Ecology | |||
| Atmospheric humidity | 5 / 9 · medium air humidity |
|
Sourced |
| Light | 8 / 9 · light |
|
Sourced |
| Nitrogen fixation | empty |
|
Not on the record |
| Ph maximum | pH 4.5 |
|
Sourced |
| Ph minimum | pH 4 |
|
Sourced |
| Soil nutriments | 1 / 9 · extremely poor (hyperoligotrophic) |
|
Sourced |
| Soil salinity | 0 / 9 · absent from saline soils |
|
Sourced |