Trans. & Proc. New Zealand Inst. 48: 199 (1916)
Each value Trefle shows for Samolus repens var. strictus, with what every source says about it. When sources disagree, the strongest source is shown (how sources are ranked). Values imported before sources were recorded one by one are marked Source not recorded.
Something wrong? Suggest a correction.
| Field | Shown | What the sources say | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core | |||
| Author | Cockayne |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Bibliography | Trans. & Proc. New Zealand Inst. 48: 199 (1916) |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Rank | var |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Status | accepted |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Year | 1916 |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Descriptive | |||
| Observations | Norfolk I. Kermadec Is., New Zealand (Poor Knights Is.) |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Morphology | |||
| Vegetable | false |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |