Mem. Bot. Surv. South Africa 20: 72 (1941)
Each value Trefle shows for Diascia patens, with what every source says about it. When sources disagree, the strongest source is shown (how sources are ranked). Values imported before sources were recorded one by one are marked Source not recorded.
Something wrong? Suggest a correction.
| Field | Shown | What the sources say | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core | |||
| Author | (Thunb.) Grant ex Fourc. |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Bibliography | Mem. Bot. Surv. South Africa 20: 72 (1941) |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Phylum | Tracheophyta |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Rank | species |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Status | accepted |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Year | 1941 |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Descriptive | |||
| Observations | S. Cape Prov. |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Morphology | |||
| Vegetable | false |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |