Not an accepted name (status: rejected). The accepted name is Drymocallis rupestris (L.) Soják, 1989.

Drymocallis rubricaulis Fourr., 1868 4% complete

No common name

Ann. Soc. Linn. Lyon 16: 371 (1868)


Data sources

Each value Trefle shows for Drymocallis rubricaulis, with what every source says about it. When sources disagree, the strongest source is shown (how sources are ranked). Values imported before sources were recorded one by one are marked Source not recorded.

Something wrong? Suggest a correction.

Sourced1 Source not recorded6 Sources: POWO / WCVP (Kew)
Field Shown What the sources say
Core
Author Fourr. No source recorded
Source not recorded
Bibliography Ann. Soc. Linn. Lyon 16: 371 (1868) No source recorded
Source not recorded
Rank species No source recorded
Source not recorded
Status rejected Sourced
Year 1868 No source recorded
Source not recorded
Descriptive
Family common name Rose family No source recorded
Source not recorded
Morphology
Vegetable false No source recorded
Source not recorded