Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 12: 200
Each value Trefle shows for Ficus amadiensis, with what every source says about it. When sources disagree, the strongest source is shown (how sources are ranked). Values imported before sources were recorded one by one are marked Source not recorded.
Something wrong? Suggest a correction.
| Field | Shown | What the sources say | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core | |||
| Author | De Wild. |
|
Sourced |
| Bibliography | Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 12: 200 |
|
Sourced |
| Rank | species |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Status | accepted |
|
Sourced |
| Year | 1913 |
|
Sourced |
| Morphology | |||
| Sexuality | empty |
|
Not on the record |