Mant. pl. 2:189. 1771
Each value Trefle shows for Protea repens, with what every source says about it. When sources disagree, the strongest source is shown (how sources are ranked). Values imported before sources were recorded one by one are marked Source not recorded.
Something wrong? Suggest a correction.
| Field | Shown | What the sources say | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core | |||
| Author | L. |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Bibliography | Mant. pl. 2:189. 1771 |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Phylum | Tracheophyta |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Rank | species |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Status | accepted |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Year | 1771 |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Descriptive | |||
| Common name | Common sugarbush |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Observations | S. Cape Prov. |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Morphology | |||
| Average height | 275 cm |
|
Sourced |
| Biological type | empty |
|
Not on the record |
| Fruit shape | empty |
|
Not on the record |
| Maximum height | empty |
|
Not on the record |
| Vegetable | false |
No source recorded
|
Source not recorded |
| Phenology | |||
| Duration | perennial |
|
Sourced |
| Ecology | |||
| Nitrogen fixation | None |
|
Sourced |
| Cultivation | |||
| Minimum root depth | 300 cm |
|
Sourced |